Home Office Tells EU National In Detention Centre To Leave The UK To 'Avoid Becoming Destitute'

Home Office Tells EU National In Detention Centre To Leave The UK To ‘Avoid Becoming Destitute’

The title of an article can tell you a lot about the narrative a newspaper is trying to push. When I first read The Guardian’s title, ‘Home Office letter tells EU citizen to ‘go home or go elsewhere,” I was pretty taken aback myself. But of course, things are not quite as dramatic as they like to make it out to be.

The Home Office told an EU national held in a detention centre to leave the UK to ‘avoid becoming destitute.’

You see, the Home Office rejected a Romanian national’s request for emergency accommodation and recommended he return his own country or another EU member state. The letter read:

“You could avoid becoming destitute by returning to Romania or another EU member state where you could enjoy access to all your ECHR [European Convention on Human Rights] without interference.”

Bigots, I know. And Remain Campaigners (why do we still have those?) are just furious I tell you. Celia Clarke, director of the legal charity Bail for Immigration Detainees, expressed her disgust to The Guardian:

“One of the worrying aspects of the Home Office letter refusing an EU national entitlement to accommodation to enable him to apply for bail to get out of detention is its tone: effectively telling a detainee to go home or go to another EU country.” “If UK officials are acting in this way towards EU nationals now, the future of our relations with EU nationals and countries should be a concern to us all. The danger is that the divorce from the EU is becoming ever more acrimonious, and this is reflected in both the tone and the practice of the Home Office.”

I love the wording. ‘Entitlement to accommodation.’ We have homeless UK citizens that I think are more entitled to that than someone from outside the country. Harsh, but I believe a country should look after its own first.

Another thing The Guardian articles takes offence to is illegal EU immigrants being deported. I mean if you’re illegally in a country, you should be deported. End of. I don’t understand why this is such a controversial opinion.
I have no qualms about making the UK into a “hostile environment for illegal immigrants,” that’s one thing May and I can agree on.

Nora Ralph

Student, worker, and Co-Founder of the #Killstream. You can also catch me on TheRalphretort Rundown.

  • Silence Dogood

    The UK getting some of it’s balls back. Yay. And yes, Nora, I don’t understand why enforcing immigration law is controversial. Probably because the people bitching about it are arguing from the their feels rather than the law. And I completely agree with you on the homeless and poor in your own country. When a country has all it’s own internal issues and citizens taken care of, THEN they can worry about people from other countries.

  • Danlantic

    Crossreference:
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/29/us-operating-largest-anti-poverty-program-world-mass-immigration/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29

    “Mass Immigration to U.S. Is World’s ‘Largest Anti-Poverty Program’ at the Expense of Americans”

    The primary source is George Borjas, a professor at Harvard’s
    Kennedy School, a leading expert on the economics of immigration.

    Borjas calculates that a 10% increase in low skills immigration means a 3% drop in wages for all the working class.

  • Maintenance Renegade

    I’m just wondering how a charity whose purpose is to give bail money to illegal aliens even pitches itself to get donations, how maliciously amoral do you even have to be to prioritize such a form of “charitable” activity over other options as a doner?

    “Well I could donate to house crippled veterans or see to it hungry children in the poor part of my town get to eat regularly but I think the real priority here is getting foreign criminals back out on our streets as quickly as possible.” – Some Rich Prog