New UN Plot to Make the Internet a Safe Space EXPOSED…and it was Hiding in Plain Sight

newuncover1

Sometimes you get a sneak peek of something so funny that you really want to open your mouth and share it with the whole world. That happened to me this past week, when Seattle4Truth (S4T) gave me a preview of his new video on the UN. You guys saw their apology yesterday, and like me, you probably thought it was bullshit. Well, there’s one thing they weren’t lying about. The UN is far from done with internet censorship. In fact, they’re just getting started.

The funny part I was talking about was how all this information was discovered. It was right there in plain sight on their websites. I can hardly believe the audacity here, but they likely figured that no one would bother checking their shit out. Well, someone did, and his name is S4T. Like me, the guy is somewhat controversial. But this information cannot be ignored because you may have issues with the messenger. Take a look and you’ll see what I mean. He found out about their hashtag plotting. By the way, it’s scheduled to debut tomorrow:ThpMCbQ

Here’s an excerpt from a transcript of Seattle’s video, which details an actual conversation these safe space nuts were having:

The choice of language was also noted as important to framing, particularly with the use of words like ‘abuse’, ‘victim’ and ‘survivor’ in relation to the issue. In one research project described during the discussion, many women did not recognize themselves as ‘victims’ as they fail to see certain conduct online as abusive, while the term ‘abuse’ is problematic because many communities still do not view certain online behavior as abusive and thus access to redress is limited.

On the other hand, naming behavior as ‘violence’ (as opposed to ‘abuse’) was also discussed, including the availability of remedies in response to ‘violence’, as well as broad conversations around the idea and scope of hate speech.

So, they tried to fan the flames of bullshit by framing this whole thing as a violence issue. They don’t care that this actually cheapens real issues. They want their tweets and SJW media pimpage no matter who it hurts. It’s all about money at the end of the day for these people. If their tripe goes over enough they get notice. More of that means more money in their bank account. Effecting meaningful change is not high on their list.

And even if it was, the change they’re going for is not something I want to be a part of. They’re putting the free and open Internet at risk with these campaigns. The only silver lining is they’re completely incompetent. How they thought making all this info publicly available was a good idea is beyond me. S4T was in their meeting this morning, for fuck’s sake. Please keep providing the lulz, UN stooges. This has been a golden couple of weeks for sure. Keep in mind that it’s not just the UN, though. A Disney exec is tied up in this, as well as reps from the Council of Europe and the UK government. I’m sure that’s only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. More is going to come out in the days and weeks to come.

(Citations link,…Also, the “Draft II” that S4T mentions is now open for comment. Have fun, guys!)

TheRalph

Founder, Owner, & Editor-in-Chief of TheRalphRetort.com. Political fiend, gamer, & anti-bullshit.

  • https://twitter.com/YAMATO_English Yamato-san

    Guess it’s time for GamerGate to hijack yet another retarded hashtag. The difference this time is that we have ample opportunity to hijack it before it even gets off the ground.

  • Fail Burton

    “Political lesbians… were the ones that said that all women can be lesbians and that heterosexuality is compulsory under a system of male supremacy.” – Julie Bindel

    That’s the woman banned by Manchester U along with Milo from debating. That is the fundamental idea at the bottom of everything the people we call “SJWs” are promoting. If you think for one minute that Brianna Wu and Anita Sarkeesian disagree with Bindel you’re wrong. It is an ideology that is anti-male, anti-white and anti-heterosexual. Treating these people any differently than the way you’d treat a neo-Nazi is ridiculous. They are insane bigots and supremacists. And was Bindel banned for that quote? Not at all. SU and the larger NUS in the U.K. are fully on board lesbian liberation ideology. What they objected to was Bindel not believing in transgenderism. That’s like nuts arguing there’s aliens on Mars but not on the Moon. Of course they want to censor everything; they cannot defend their insane ideas.

    • http://nobodygetsoffended.wordpress.com/ Jack Outis

      Oh Bindel, who else has said sexuality is
      “a choice” ?

      • Not buying it

        ALLAH AKBAR FEMINISM.

        • http://nobodygetsoffended.wordpress.com/ Jack Outis
          • ThatGuy

            Dude. Don’t diss snickers with such heinous talk.

          • http://nobodygetsoffended.wordpress.com/ Jack Outis

            too late…

            Mars and skittles are next!

          • ThatGuy

            Plx don’t take mai starbursts from me.

          • http://nobodygetsoffended.wordpress.com/ Jack Outis

            What? Just because they are brown and small? No sir, this is LA nobody gives Mexicans or snickers a free pass, everybody into the freezer, then up the radfems cavities…

  • Sockpuppet Nora

    >Case studies don’t match the ‘report’
    >Put in anyway so people don’t get offended

    I clap for you UN…

  • Ceger

    I took a shot across the bow.

    • Ceger

      So they propose to fight VAWG by promoting VAFS (Violence Against Free Speech).

    • Tehy

      yeah, I left a nice little comment, let’s see what they make of it

  • Fatherless

    By the way, if you think full bore internet censorship is the end game, you’re fooling yourself. That’s just laying the groundwork for something else, a solution a little but more final in scope.

  • ty2010

    Um, the UN isn’t the only thing people, all fronts, TPP is a bigger threat ATM.

    • Ceger

      Yeah, that can be quite the game changer, something that can help usher in the full birth of technocracy. That would be extremely bad.

    • Psichaos

      You could combine the two, really. Use the #takebackthetech hashtag campaign as a campaign against TPP. In that sense, the hashtag actually makes sense.

  • Toastrider

    *begins playing Weird Al’s ‘Word Crimes’*

  • Syltique

    So he has access to literally everything lol. Holy shit.

  • Maintenance Renegade

    Yeah the victory celebrations regarding this UN garbage were more than a little premature, torching that incompetent document wasn’t so much a surrender as it was the first stage of a tactical retreat and re-consolidation.

    Just because their ideas are demonstrably terrible isn’t going to stop these people from trying, making up ridiculous bullshit is what they do for a living. They’ve got the ultimate incentive therefore to keep trying.

  • Mark Samenfink

    I have plans for that hashtag

  • Gregg Braddoch

    I’d wager this isn’t about feminism at it’s core – this is justification for wholesale control over internet content by the UN. Hopefully their poor choice of a catalyst will hurt them in the long run.

    • https://konachan.com GamesGoodMeGood

      “I’d wager this isn’t about feminism at it’s core”

      Are you kidding me? The fact that they make this an ‘issue’ only for women and girls means that it completely stinks of feminist ideology. Also, it’s another indirect way of saying that only men and boys can be the harassers and perpetrators, and never be the victims.

      This is feminism hiding behind a mask.

      • Aaron L

        Sorry, you’re not doing it right. Feminism has always been supported by corporations and governments to promote nanny-state, totalitarian policies. Besides, their is no hidden feminism. They are overtly feminist. Feminism doesn’t need to hide, it’s supported by the entirety of the media. The UN, and the interests behind the UN, are pushing for control of the internet because their agenda entails the total restructuring and leveling of the globe. This agenda requires suppression of popular dissent. They have to (((shut it down!!))) because people aren’t listening to mainstream media anymore, they’re using the still open and free internet.

      • Gregg Braddoch

        My point was that the UN would probably like to institute internet censorship with or without feminism as the excuse. Sure, feminism is hiding behind the mask of the UN, but the UN is also using feminism as their hot button issue to censor the internet.

  • Dave The Sandman

    and they be like….

    • Dave The Sandman

      and one more extra salty

  • Don Saxton

    This was NOT done by UN Women, but rather United Nations Broadband Commission for Digital Development. IMPORTANT difference! Some of the commissioners like maybe Jeffrey Sachs, are NOT going to be happy tying their name to illiberal censorship using bogus arguments and questionable “research”. Complain to your favorite Commissioner.

    Here are the commissioners:
    http://www.broadbandcommission.org/commissioners/Pages/default.aspx

  • http://mipmapp.tumblr.com MipMapp

    Not happy with “abuse” so we change it to “violence”.

    Ugh. This kind of fucking with words leads to misleading studies that start including an unwelcome touch into rape statistics.

    Being pinched on the bottom in a nightclub is not the same as being raped and defining the two as the same is misleading and dishonest.

    I have obscenities shouted at me in the street by randoms, and that is not “violence”. A black dude called me a dickhead as I got on the train, and that isn’t violence. Words on the Internet are not violence. Being punched by someone who intends to knock you out IS violence

  • Pingback: #TakeBackTheTech? From Who? | KazperTehOne()

  • Silence Dogood

    What about so called internet violence against men and boys? Oh, right, you can’t hoist up people with a Y chromosome as victims without being laughed at (unless they’re a chick-with-a-dick I suppose). Seriously, why should the UN be allowed to dictate anything? Only a small percentage of their membership is made out of what you would call “first world, western nations,” ie the only fucking nations whose values and goals actually matter. That’s right Africa and South America, I’m looking at you and your ass backwards bullshit. *ahem* Censorship is bad and this is getting to be a bit ridiculous.

    • Tehy

      how to reform un

      firstworld western nations (no human rights BS, democracy), get 20 votes.

      that’s all

  • Silence Dogood

    “The choice of language” part is SUPER FUCKING CREEPY. Like, Orwellian creepy. My skin is fucking crawling. “Women don’t know they’re victims so we have to explain it to them…” and “…redefine words because people don’t see it as abuse.” Like, what the actual fuck? The want to call perceived abuse something OTHER than abuse because online communities don’t… see it… as… abuse? WTF? My brain is going to start bleeding from all the Double Speak and Double Think going on. The pearl clutching from moral scolds (it’s 2015 for fuck’s sake!) about how people behave on the internet (which at the end of the day is likely them projecting how they don’t like people disagreeing with them and demanding “citations please” when they spout their bullshit) is sickening.

  • Pingback: The United Nations Plans to #TakeBackTheTech | KazperTehOne()

  • Kellen Joel

    Welp, I’ve lost all my respect for Disney now

    • Lost Question

      wait, you still had respect for disney? they are pretty horrible company in general that only has a kid friendly wholesome veneer.

      • Kellen Joel

        Nah, just kidding. Their one redeeming quality as of right now is the Marvel movies.

        • ThatGuy

          They only fund those. Marvel Studios does all the rest of the work.

          • Kellen Joel

            Never mind then

  • Fail Burton

    Here’s how it was in the days of antiquity.

    “Gee, wouldn’t it be cool to see Carmine Infantino ink Jack Kirby in the Fantastic Four?”

    Fast forward to Wu/Sarkeesian/DykeFemme days:

    “Gee, they couldn’t find a woman to do that? And one who’s not cis-normative, or maybe one who’s a disabled person of color? Fucking white men.”

    Then, when we push back against that shit, we’re “harassing” women. No, we’re not “harassing” women. We’re saying stop trying to play golf in a church. Take your weird obsessions somewhere else.

  • ThePete

    UNfortunately for Anita and others I don’t think they’ll be able to pull of the endgame of stopping people from saying she sucks on the internet.

    Although I suspect there will be an attempt to shoe-horn disagreement with feminists under some harassment category in a UN report so they can leverage google, twitter etc to intervene.

  • Tehy

    remember, if you can’t convince people, hijack powerful words

    word hijacking is the most dishonest thing to exist and I can’t even joke about it, FUCK ANYONE that does it

  • Fail Burton

    Globally, 4 men are murdered for every one woman. In the eyes of this ideology which is rooted in lesbian supremacist doctrine, that equals violence against women. The funniest thing about this ideology is it asserts men created heterosexuality in pre-history to oppress women. That’s like saying it happened before the rise of Middle Earth or the age of Conan the Barbarian. Think I’m kidding? They all believe this. Among the lesbian activists who believe this are PhD Artemis March and Charlotte Bunch, the latter involved with and honored by the U.N., and also the Clintons. That’s the whole reason this is really a lesbian liberation ideology. They mean to overturn that pre-historic coup or whatever the fuck it was. These people are mad-hatters. Andrea Dworkin testified for 30 min. in front of the Meese Commission about how pornography incited violence against women. In her 1974 book Women Hating she asserted a Matriarchal society of Hobbit-like sorceresses existed in England until the 17th century and passed on their magic to millions of women-witches, 9 million of whom were executed by Christian men over 300 years. That’s 80 a day! 1/6 of that book is devoted to that garbage, mostly in a chapter called “Gynocide – The Witches.” These nutters are inspired more by Tolkien and Robert E. Howard than anthropology or science. Fast forward to Sarkeesian. She is passing this pre-historic coup along by Tweeting “Masculinity is a socially constructed and performed gender identity.” In every instance radfems agree that act happened in pre-history.

  • Lost Question

    so ralph will we have a report on their reaction when they have something of theirs taken away?

  • Pingback: #TakeBackTheTech Creator Called for Action Against #GamerGate | KazperTehOne()

  • Pingback: FIFA 16 Career Mode()

  • Pingback: FIFA Coins()

  • Pingback: FUT16coin Mobille()

  • Pingback: FIFA 16 Coins()

  • Pingback: FIFA Coins()