OY VEY: Leftists Aren't Even Hiding Their Hatred of Jews Anymore

OY VEY: Leftists Aren’t Even Hiding Their Hatred of Jews Anymore

Gay Pride parades have been totally taken over by intersectionality as of late, and a “Dyke March” in Chicago that recently banned participants from showing their Jewish heritage is the most recent example:

Three people carrying Jewish Pride flags were asked to leave the annual Chicago Dyke March on Saturday.

The Chicago-based LGBTQ newspaper Windy City Times quoted a Dyke March collective member as saying the rainbow flag with the Star of David in the middle “made people feel unsafe,” and that the march was “pro-Palestinian” and “anti-Zionist.”

It doesn’t make much sense for “Dykes” to hate Israel. It’s not like Israel hates LGBT, in fact, it’s probably the most LGBT friendly country in the Mid-East. It only makes sense if you realize that intersectionality has entirely engulfed the scene, and the march organizers would rather side with radical Islamic whackos who would like to see them thrown off buildings. Intersectionalism is a mental disorder.

The whole situation is raised to another level of irony when you realize that these leftists are the same type that calls anyone to the right of Stalin a “Nazi”. Yet these are the people that justify kicking out a Jewish Pride flag from a “Dyke March”.

The incident at Evergreen College also has strong anti-Jewish undertones, because the professor, Bret Weinstein who was accosted for being white is Jewish. The students openly accuse Mr. Weinstein of ‘hiding behind his Jewishness’.

The centralized spin-off of Black Lives Matter, the Movement for Black Lives, declared war on Israel about a year ago. Back then, the problem could be swept under the rug. Now it’s all spilling out into the open.

Democrats are becoming increasingly open about hating not only whites, but Jews specifically. Yet they seem to hurl accusations of Naziism at their opposition at an ever-increasing rate. I guess this is what happens when the ideology of leftism collapses under the weight of its own stupidity.

 

Seattle4Truth

Political Editor of TheRalphRetort.com. Previously published by Capital Research Center.Twitter: @spaghetti4poop

  • tz1

    This is one of the expected and key fractures of the left.
    In the late 1960’s early 70s things like forced busing for desegregation caused “Jewish Flight” earlier than white flight and some black activists noted they owned the stores, and marched but went home to safe suburban neighborhoods at night.

    The Democats went with Identity politics. Jews are going to have a problem in that environment. There are only a handful of holocaust survivors left, and you can’t guilt grandchildren. The Hispanics don’t care, nor do the blacks or gays. And Democrats have the 1%er problem represented by Hillary – so their Jewish Question (JQ) will be even more profound than any on the alt-right.

    • tallorder

      Wow. Good observation.

  • tz1

    And Israel has a wall and defacto apartheid, and the Boycott-Divestment ? (BDS) is strong.
    Israel is an ethno-nationalist state. For the left to be against ethno-nationalism, it has to condemn Israel. But consistency is a hobgoblin most lefty minds are nearly immune to.

    • Inquiring

      “And Israel has a wall and defacto apartheid…”
      Unless you are doing an impersonation of a lefty regressive, go fuck yourself.

      Israel is not, in any sense of the fucking phrase, a “defacto apartheid”.

      Palenstine on the other hand, most assuredly practices apartheid, as they refuse to treat Jews, or allow Jews around their businesses or homes.

  • Silence Dogood

    I foresee the radical left eventually breaking out into full scale riots and violence as they become hysterically convinced that everyone who disagrees with them is a Nazi. And then the right-wing and the powers that be will have to stomp them into the fucking ground and balance will be restored.

    • Maintenance Renegade

      I see a number of possible futures right now but I’m sad to say I think we’re past a point of no return, the golden path is now completely out of reach and we’re going to spiral into some form of authoritarianism. The left needed be reformed because it’s become authoritarian, delusional and stupid but any and all pressures anyone puts on it to try and convince it to reform just cause it to lash out with ever increasing madness. It’s now stuck in an irrational spiral of failing and completely unjustified attempts at revenge against a shocked and horrified center.

      • Silence Dogood

        The moderates who branch off from the Left will show support for the Right only to the extent that the Right, itself, remains moderate. If the Right resumes the madness of the “silent majority” and the “moral majority”, the moderates from the Left will have no choice but to back the insanity of the Progtards. We see in Congress now a number of Moderate Republicans who are turning what should be hegemony into a shit show because they realize what the Hard Right Conservatives are trying to do with things like Health Care are political suicide in any place except for strongholds. The Left will have to reform itself at some point, especially as the fanatics of the Far Left and the Progtards continue to alienate moderates and cost themselves elections. Of course since no politician who has ever lived can avoid shitting themselves publicly at some point, if we get 8 years of Trump I wouldn’t be surprised if the pendulum swings back the other way again just from what will be an almost mandatory swelling of conceit and arrogance from the Right. That’s the problem in politics right now – these people think they’re fucking OWED the votes of the masses with little to no concern for how their plans and identity politics affect the common person. -_-

        • Maintenance Renegade

          Thing is one of the most likely outcomes I see to the current political trends is so many people flocking to one extreme or another because the extremists are the only ones interested in talking about what the public actually gives a shit about. The political establishment while generally “moderate” (but only out of love for the politics of business as usual) is simply too bought and paid for by the forces that are creating the problems people want solutions to.

          The likely result is obvious. A tiny ineffectual center that doesn’t have a clue what to do or a message anyone is buying into while multiple extremist factions fully go to war with each other before one inevitably wins and becomes the dominant culture.

        • Typical

          Or, crazy idea, they might think “holy shit, these libertarians might have the right idea.” Not holding my breath tho.

          • tallorder

            No, they won’t, because liberalism never retreats. Classical liberalism is the ancestor of contemporary liberalism. Without the mad philosophies of Jefferson, Locke, Voltaire, and Hobbes, we would have no SJW. There is no going back to 1776; liberalism always continues downward and left.

            Remember, 1000+ years of Christian rule during Christendom brought us Western civilization.
            200 years of secular, classical liberal revolution brought us children confused as to which bathroom to use.

          • Typical

            To be fair the same argument can be made that conservatives keep moving towards more moral authoritarianism.

          • tallorder

            I used to campaign for Ron Paul. Now, I see one of the most insane things he ever said was “one cannot legislate morality.”
            This is absolutely wrong, and fundamentally shows an ignorance of history and philosophy. Plato taught that the Great Teacher was civil law. What becomes “legal” shapes a generation to what is morally acceptable.
            Libertarians only call it “authoritarianism” because they abhor the thought of objective standards; the thought of an objective moral code for everyone impedes upon their “freedom” to be hedonists.
            Civilization was a lot more stable and sane when divorce, adultery, and sodomy laws were enforced.

          • Typical

            Yeah, the government should totally be wasting taxpayer dollars monitoring how people fuck. I hope you never got your wife to suck you off, you dirty criminal you.

            Maybe if conservatives would learn to just not try to control stuff that’s not any of their business and affects them not at all, the Republicans wouldn’t be scratching their heads wondering how the only way they seemed able to win was with an ahole like trump.

          • tallorder

            A republic can only last as long as the people are moral. Without any objective standard of morality whatsoever, we’ve gone further than even any religiously pagan civilization has even gone–officiating ‘marriages’ between sexual deviants of the same gender.

            You classical liberals denounce big government yet also throw off the yoke of Western civilization in its moral code, expecting generations to not descend into animalistic barbarity and even yet expecting government not to grow in order to rein in this barbarity. Discussing philosophy with classical liberal libertarians is like arguing with a toddler.

          • Typical

            I’m not a classical liberal. I’m a libertarian extremist. People should be free to live their lives as they please, providing no one else is hurt by their actions. 2 flamers butt fucking isn’t affecting me in the slightest. You nannying conservatives telling people what they can’t do in their private lives is as bad as libtards telling you what guns you shouldn’t be able to own. If some retard wants to kill themselves with drugs, let them, when they try to rob me to support their habit, I should be free to defend myself and property with deadly force as necessary.

            Please, since I’m such a child in my understanding of issues, lay out with your intellectual superiority how a law against butt fucking serves a public good. Still, I notice you haven’t answered me about your own wife sucking your dick though.

          • tallorder

            Basically that makes you a radical classical liberal–the ‘Left’ that filled the left side of the court during the French Revolution. You’re still a liberal, bud.

            The private behavior of a people spills out into the public and finds its way into public policy. As Aristotle said, men become revolutionaries for personal reasons. Don’t worry, though, your sort of hedonism will continue to prevail until society completely collapses while libertarians screechingly joust over the famed, mythical utopia of personal license that was “never really tried.” Truly, when ‘liberty’ is invoked, it almost always means sexual license.

          • Typical

            Funny how you’re quoting Aristotle and Plato on the virtues of a republic, yet the Greeks were a bunch of big butt fucking homos, with slaves. Doesn’t seem very moral to me. So where are you on the blowjob situation, are you the one guy in existence who doesn’t like them or what?

            Personal moral beliefs have no bearing on justice. Murder is detrimental to society and is therefore a crime, it robs a person of their life and future. faggotry is not, it is no different than a hetero couple deciding not to have children in the scheme of the progress of civilization. You Conservatives and libs are really the same insofar as your desire to enslave others, your only argument is the brand of chain.

            Because a group of you decide you don’t like a particular behavior doesn’t make your theft of another person’s freedom more just because there are more of you, it simply makes you a mob.

            I notice you still only want to toss recrimination my way rather than support your arguments, that’s cool, I believe you have the freedom to be a pretentious douche too, you just don’t have the right to limit my freedoms in accordance with your twisted beliefs.

          • tallorder

            Aristotle and Plato spoke against sodomitical degeneracy, actually. They noted how the immorality of sodomy and coitus interruptus are the signs of a failing civilization. They also laid the framework for equating heterosexuals who prevent the natural result of the marital act with sodomites; both taking what is fruitful, sex, and making it sterile.

            In your libertarian utopia, you can behave like a sodomite if you wish.

            Just for the record, I’m not a conservative. A conservative is likened to the ‘right’ of the revolutionary politic paradigm that came out of the French Revolution–the precursor to the madness we see today. There is nothing to conserve in that system.

          • Typical

            Yet, you’re spouting off the tenets of classical conservatism ie: that it requires a biblical moral component, rather than a logical, pragmatic approach.

            That’s why the republicans fail so often, had they been smart, they’d reverse their stance on things like abortion, it takes away a giant argument from the left while at the same time reducing their numbers of future voters, given that those with means to support a child and morals are less likely to have an abortion, thus relegating the abortions to the morally bankrupt and the poor, who could always use a thinning of their numbers.

          • tallorder

            Well of course there is ideological crossover in American conservatism. Still, it’s comparing apples to oranges, like telling a Muslim that he is basically an American conservative because he has ideological crossover.

            Yeah–I’m an advocate of the moral code that built the foundations of Western civilization.

            You’re obviously of the school that says there is no truth except for what is true to you. I was in the libertarian camp once. It is implicitly believed that truth changes over time and place. Two plus two has always been four in the past, but we’re modern now–it can be six if you really want it to.
            There is no objective truth and that statement itself isn’t true for anyone else because nothing is objectively true.

            If we had embraced a general moral code as a foundation, we wouldn’t be seeing the degeneracy and societal collapse that we have today. We wouldn’t be teetering on the collapse of birth rates because of hedonism, contraception, and abortion; giving the elites an excuse for unmitigated third world immigration. We wouldn’t be seeing increasingly rising taxes because of the lack of people being born and paying taxes, etc.
            Immorality has consequences.

          • Typical

            Nice attempt to strawman, I’ve never claimed untruth is truth. Your morality is subjective, that’s where you’re having a logical failing. There is much truth that is true to me, because it’s true. I notice you still haven’t articulated in all your walls of text what harm the moral horrors your’e against cause.

          • Typical

            Oh, and as an aside, it ends up almost always meaning sexual license because you repressed Christians are obsessed with how others have sex. I’ve already stated I don’t care what others do as long as force or other coercion isn’t involved and all parties are of sound mind and ability to decide. I could have a similar conversation about my right to own an automatic weapon, you’re the one hung up on which bathroom to use, and mentioned adultery and sodomy laws, seems all that is on your mind.

          • Silence Dogood

            Moderate Libertarians aren’t bad people, but the ones who support the whole notion of “no government” and envision a world of shotgun totting “one man is a king/get off my property” are frankly quite dangerous. I’d even go so far to say they’re the Right Wing reflection of Antifa.

          • Typical

            Not really, don’t mess with me and I won’t mess with you is a pretty universally just principle. To compare them to people forcing you to do what they want is not seeming right to me.

          • Silence Dogood

            Except that entire principal goes out the window as soon as someone decides to mess with someone else, usually with overwhelming force, or at the very least intimidation. You don’t necessarily need bigger weapons to intimidate someone – just having a group to go with you can do that. That’s the “warlord effect” people constantly bring up against anarchists who honestly think we can exist in a power vacuum. Look at modern day Africa for real life examples and The Walking Dead for fictional ones. As long as there are at least two people on the planet relatively near each other they will wind up competing for resources and possibly with a desire to impose their ideology on the other.

          • Typical

            Anarchy of course never works, but in the same way that socialism and communism and capitalism in their pure forms don’t work. I find it hard to believe anyone who advocates for those in completely pure, unregulated forms is either not serious, or an idiot.

          • Silence Dogood

            Capitalism worked really well until it morphed into crony capitalism. Now it’s basically impossible to get ahead and the mega rich are corrupting the political system and undermining democracy (1 person with $100 should NOT have as much say as 100 people with $1 each). Automation will, unfortunately, be the eventual death of Capitalism since it will remove the need for the working class. There will need to be several changes in order to support the population – a government stipend that people can use to buy food and goods, regulated housing, state control over utilities and the most wealthy being forced to contribute proportionally to the system to keep it running. The problem is if any of this is instituted incrementally it likely won’t work. 🙁

          • Typical

            I doubt that very much, it’ll simply be a shifting of the minimum skills required for survival again. 200 years ago handling a horse was a mundane skill, now, rich dorks do it for pleasure. Same thing will continue as technology changes.

          • Silence Dogood

            Doubt all you like, but the fact remains that Capitalism absolutely requires not only class striation, but a vibrant working class, which is what ultimate fuels the middle class. Automation is going to kill that.

          • Typical

            Yeah, you can believe it will be the end of all things, but no one is missing telephone relay operators, pony express riders, milkmen, ice deliveries, the coal truck, or a thousand other jobs made obsolete by technology. Times change, skills required to survive evolve, the only tragedy is that we don’t allow the incapable to starve and leave more resources for the useful among us.

          • Silence Dogood

            No one is missing them, but their jobs went away. New jobs appeared, but let me ask you, what about all the factory jobs that went away that Trump wanted to bring back? The “new” jobs that arrived were fewer in number (thanks to automation) and required a much higher level of education (many people can’t afford to get that education or move to a new place). The loop is narrowing. And your last sentence is worrying “allow the incapable to starve and leave more resources for the useful among us.” That sounds Marxist. As I already pointed out not everyone can afford to leave the area they were born in and people definitely can’t afford to go to college all the time, let alone good ones (which are competitive adding in a new level of restriction). We’re already seeing a push to make college tuition free to compensate (well, unless your family is rich that is), which I imagine is a reaction to the shift in and decrease in jobs that pay a livable wage.

          • Typical

            How it is marxist to allow those who can’t support themselves to die? Adapt or die, it works all throughout nature except in humans, where it’s “if you can’t adapt, marxists will force the producers in society to hold your hand so you can get your free phones, medical care, and food assistance.”

          • Silence Dogood

            Those people who occupied those jobs probably did adapt, because they were low skill/low pay jobs, but as automation takes away more and more jobs and the population continues to grow exponentially through reproduction and immigration (all praise be to the God-Emperor for hopefully slowing the later part down), there will simply be more and more kids who wind up being conned into going into debt at colleges because there simply aren’t those “hard-work-required-but-pays-well” jobs. I personally can’t wait for this student loan bubble to burst. Going to be fucking hysterical.

          • Typical

            They should learn to fix robots then huh? Look, there are plenty of jobs that don’t require college, there will continue to be. Tech changes, so you have to adapt as well. There will always be jobs that can’t be automated, there will always be people that don’t wan to pay for automation. The big problem is paying people more than they are worth and taking care of those that can’t make it on their own. Overpopulation is a problem, letting a few hundred million die would make resources more abundant, hence cheaper.

          • Silence Dogood

            Free phones I don’t agree with, fyi, but support in medical care and food assistance is important to a lot of people who simply can’t make ends meet – they’re not all Latrina’s w/ 6 kids and 3 baby daddies getting her nails did 3 times a month while her kids eat tater tots every night. Some people really do need those supports and I’m going to guess you’ve never been in that situation. -_-

          • Typical

            Never claimed they were, however, the flip side of the land of opportunity is the opportunity for catastrophic failure. As the poet Vince Neil said, If you want to live life on your own terms, you gotta be willing to crash and burn. Most of people who have issues are suffering the consequences of their own poor life decisions and I shouldn’t be penalized for their stupidity.

  • Maintenance Renegade

    I wish my own stance on Israel and Palestine was more common in America and the West at large in that I detest them both. It’s become apparent now though that if there is a highly organized international Jewish conspiracy of the type oft discussed on /pol/ said conspirators are either playing some really nth level 5D chess or they’ve completely screwed the pooch through some truly epic hubris.

    In terms of funding, sympathy and affiliations the prog blocs of the West are now sitting on a faultine between Zionism and Islamism and the Islamists appear to be winning the propaganda war as evidenced by the direction the useful idiots are moving in.

    • Tony Murphy

      Jews will always be able to control the inbred Muslim retards. Their real battle has always been against White Christian nationalism. (I acknowledge that a large minority of Jews want no part in such a battle).

  • Tony Murphy

    I can see the day when Jews come crawling back to White Christians asking for protection from their minority pets who turned on them and asking forgiveness for destroying our societies. Such forgiveness won’t be forthcoming from me.