I have a long-standing grudge against media outlets who publish the manifesto of mass murderers. We see it happen time and time again. We hear criticism, but no one ever stops doing it. That’s one of the downsides of a free press. There is no way to stop it, really. And since Gawker has already gleefully ran with this, I figure my site talking about it will be similar to pissing in the ocean. It’s not gonna make much difference. I am against this practice, but there seems to be nothing that can be done to stop it. So I’ll just let you all read the shit for yourselves rather than having to go to Gawker. This may sound hypocritical, but oh well. It will be all over every newscast tonight/today anyway.

Here’s the manifesto. This reprinting is not an endorsement, needless to say. The “n-word” has been censored just in case Google has problems with that. I know Gawker gets away with whatever they want, but I can’t really afford to take the chance:

I was not raised in a racist home or environment. Living in the South, almost every White person has a small amount of racial awareness, simply beause of the numbers of negroes in this part of the country. But it is a superficial awareness. Growing up, in school, the White and black kids would make racial jokes toward each other, but all they were were jokes. Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.

The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries. Again I found myself in disbelief. As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there. From here I found out about the Jewish problem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.

Blacks

I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have the most real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans.

N****** are stupid and violent. At the same time they have the capacity to be very slick. Black people view everything through a racial lense. Thats what racial awareness is, its viewing everything that happens through a racial lense. They are always thinking about the fact that they are black. This is part of the reason they get offended so easily, and think that some thing are intended to be racist towards them, even when a White person wouldnt be thinking about race. The other reason is the Jewish agitation of the black race.

Black people are racially aware almost from birth, but White people on average dont think about race in their daily lives. And this is our problem. We need to and have to.

Say you were to witness a dog being beat by a man. You are almost surely going to feel very sorry for that dog. But then say you were to witness a dog biting a man. You will most likely not feel the same pity you felt for the dog for the man. Why? Because dogs are lower than men.

This same analogy applies to black and White relations. Even today, blacks are subconsciously viewed by White people are lower beings. They are held to a lower standard in general. This is why they are able to get away with things like obnoxious behavior in public. Because it is expected of them.

Modern history classes instill a subconscious White superiority complex in Whites and an inferiority complex in blacks. This White superiority complex that comes from learning of how we dominated other peoples is also part of the problem I have just mentioned. But of course I dont deny that we are in fact superior.

I wish with a passion that n****** were treated terribly throughout history by Whites, that every White person had an ancestor who owned slaves, that segregation was an evil an oppressive institution, and so on. Because if it was all it true, it would make it so much easier for me to accept our current situation. But it isnt true. None of it is. We are told to accept what is happening to us because of ancestors wrong doing, but it is all based on historical lies, exaggerations and myths. I have tried endlessly to think of reasons we deserve this, and I have only came back more irritated because there are no reasons.

Only a fourth to a third of people in the South owned even one slave. Yet every White person is treated as if they had a slave owning ancestor. This applies to in the states where slavery never existed, as well as people whose families immigrated after slavery was abolished. I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive. One sticks out in my mind where an old ex-slave recounted how the day his mistress died was one of the saddest days of his life. And in many of these narratives the slaves told of how their masters didnt even allowing whipping on his plantation.

Segregation was not a bad thing. It was a defensive measure. Segregation did not exist to hold back negroes. It existed to protect us from them. And I mean that in multiple ways. Not only did it protect us from having to interact with them, and from being physically harmed by them, but it protected us from being brought down to their level. Integration has done nothing but bring Whites down to level of brute animals. The best example of this is obviously our school system.

Now White parents are forced to move to the suburbs to send their children to “good schools”. But what constitutes a “good school”? The fact is that how good a school is considered directly corresponds to how White it is. I hate with a passion the whole idea of the suburbs. To me it represents nothing but scared White people running. Running because they are too weak, scared, and brainwashed to fight. Why should we have to flee the cities we created for the security of the suburbs? Why are the suburbs secure in the first place? Because they are White. The pathetic part is that these White people dont even admit to themselves why they are moving. They tell themselves it is for better schools or simply to live in a nicer neighborhood. But it is honestly just a way to escape n****** and other minorities.

But what about the White people that are left behind? What about the White children who, because of school zoning laws, are forced to go to a school that is 90 percent black? Do we really think that that White kid will be able to go one day without being picked on for being White, or called a “white boy”? And who is fighting for him? Who is fighting for these White people forced by economic circumstances to live among negroes? No one, but someone has to.

Here I would also like to touch on the idea of a Norhtwest Front. I think this idea is beyond stupid. Why should I for example, give up the beauty and history of my state to go to the Norhthwest? To me the whole idea just parralells the concept of White people running to the suburbs. The whole idea is pathetic and just another way to run from the problem without facing it.

Some people feel as though the South is beyond saving, that we have too many blacks here. To this I say look at history. The South had a higher ratio of blacks when we were holding them as slaves. Look at South Africa, and how such a small minority held the black in apartheid for years and years. Speaking of South Africa, if anyone thinks that think will eventually just change for the better, consider how in South Africa they have affirmative action for the black population that makes up 80 percent of the population.

It is far from being too late for America or Europe. I believe that even if we made up only 30 percent of the population we could take it back completely. But by no means should we wait any longer to take drastic action.

Anyone who thinks that White and black people look as different as we do on the outside, but are somehow magically the same on the inside, is delusional. How could our faces, skin, hair, and body structure all be different, but our brains be exactly the same? This is the nonsense we are led to believe.

Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior. If a scientist publishes a paper on the differences between the races in Western Europe or Americans, he can expect to lose his job. There are personality traits within human families, and within different breeds of cats or dogs, so why not within the races?

A horse and a donkey can breed and make a mule, but they are still two completely different animals. Just because we can breed with the other races doesnt make us the same.

In a modern history class it is always emphasized that, when talking about “bad” things Whites have done in history, they were White. But when we lern about the numerous, almost countless wonderful things Whites have done, it is never pointed out that these people were White. Yet when we learn about anything important done by a black person in history, it is always pointed out repeatedly that they were black. For example when we learn about how George Washington carver was the first n***** smart enough to open a peanut.

On another subject I want to say this. Many White people feel as though they dont have a unique culture. The reason for this is that White culture is world culture. I dont mean that our culture is made up of other cultures, I mean that our culture has been adopted by everyone in the world. This makes us feel as though our culture isnt special or unique. Say for example that every business man in the world wore a kimono, that every skyscraper was in the shape of a pagoda, that every door was a sliding one, and that everyone ate every meal with chopsticks. This would probably make a Japanese man feel as though he had no unique traditional culture.

I have noticed a great disdain for race mixing White women within the White nationalists community, bordering on insanity it. These women are victims, and they can be saved. Stop.

Jews

Unlike many White naitonalists, I am of the opinion that the majority of American and European jews are White. In my opinion the issues with jews is not their blood, but their identity. I think that if we could somehow destroy the jewish identity, then they wouldnt cause much of a problem. The problem is that Jews look White, and in many cases are White, yet they see themselves as minorities. Just like n******, most jews are always thinking about the fact that they are jewish. The other issue is that they network. If we could somehow turn every jew blue for 24 hours, I think there would be a mass awakening, because people would be able to see plainly what is going on.

I dont pretend to understand why jews do what they do. They are enigma.

Hispanics

Hispanics are obviously a huge problem for Americans. But there are good hispanics and bad hispanics. I remember while watching hispanic television stations, the shows and even the commercials were more White than our own. They have respect for White beauty, and a good portion of hispanics are White. It is a well known fact that White hispanics make up the elite of most hispanics countries. There is good White blood worht saving in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and even Brasil.

But they are still our enemies.

East Asians

I have great respent for the East Asian races. Even if we were to go extinct they could carry something on. They are by nature very racist and could be great allies of the White race. I am not opposed at all to allies with the Northeast Asian races.

Patriotism

I hate the sight of the American flag. Modern American patriotism is an absolute joke. People pretending like they have something to be proud while White people are being murdered daily in the streets. Many veterans believe we owe them something for “protecting our way of life” or “protecting our freedom”. But im not sure what way of life they are talking about. How about we protect the White race and stop fighting for the jews. I will say this though, I myself would have rather lived in 1940’s American than Nazi Germany, and no this is not ignorance speaking, it is just my opinion. So I dont blame the veterans of any wars up until after Vietnam, because at least they had an American to be proud of and fight for.

An Explanation

To take a saying from a film, “I see all this stuff going on, and I dont see anyone doing anything about it. And it pisses me off.”. To take a saying from my favorite film, “Even if my life is worth less than a speck of dirt, I want to use it for the good of society.”.

I have no choice. I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.

Unfortunately at the time of writing I am in a great hurry and some of my best thoughts, actually many of them have been to be left out and lost forever. But I believe enough great White minds are out there already.

Please forgive any typos, I didnt have time to check it.

It’s legit. Go ahead and comment down below. I really don’t know what to say to all this, especially since I’m not even a fan of giving the murderers the satisfaction. But, I run a website that deals with news now, and this is what everyone is talking about. So, go ahead and talk about it. You can include your thoughts about the practice of printing these in the first place as well, if you’d like. I’m gonna go look for some SJWs to talk about in order to cleanse the palate.

43 comments
  1. >”I have a long-standing grudge against media outlets who publish the manifesto of mass murderers….We hear criticism, but no one ever stops doing it…..I am against this practice”

    So you go ahead and print the manifesto of a mass murdering racist in order to deny Gawker the click? Dafuqizdatboutbro?!?

    “Everyone is talking about it” is not an excuse to join in the nattering which teaches other psychopaths that if they slaughter innocents, they will have their every hateful rationale disseminated far and wide by the media. If you hate media outlets publicizing killers, YOU DON’T MIMIC THEM AND PUBLICIZE KILLERS! PERIOD! You should’ve said, “I hate when media outlets do it, so I’m not going to do it and I’m not linking to it. You want it so bad, go find it yourselves.”

    Murderers who seek fame for their infamy should be denied the attention they seek. I make a point of trying to not know the names of these killers, referring to them by their crimes (e.g. “the Batman shooter”, “the Newtown shooter”, “the UVA shooter”, “Gabby Giffords shooter”) because to forget them is the opposite of what they sought. I don’t care about their manifestos and grievances. They are monsters that a civilized society would be putting down like the mad dogs they are, not publicized.

    Instead you pasted it all here. You are now an accomplice, no better than Gawker. Congratulations.

    1. There’s no point in my site, an outlet that gets a tiny fraction of the eyeballs and pay that Gawker gets, holding back from publishing the screed when the entire US media (led by Gawker) is talking about it. I said I was against publicizing it, and I still am. But not running it is stupid when it’s already going to be out there in the first place. Why should I refrain when it’s everywhere? If someone would actually try to get a media code of conduct going for this sort of thing, maybe it could change. Even then, someone somewhere will run it. So while I’m against it, like I said in the intro before the manifesto…oh well.

      1. “And if everyone else jumped off a bridge, what would you do?” – Your Mother

        It’s all about what you believe in and what you stand for. If you’re against something, you don’t do it just because everyone else is doing it. If you’re at a party where everyone is passing around a joint but you don’t smoke, do you say “no thanks” or do you toke down because “everyone else is doing it”?

        Using your “logic”, you should be viciously anti-GamerGate because ALL OF THE OTHER MEDIA OUTLETS are against gamers and consider them to be violent, hateful, racist, misogynerds who claim to be for ethics in journalism, but really want women/gays/minorities driven out of their white cishet male playgrounds.

        You had an opportunity to prove yourself different and I thought this piece was going to be just that: A declaration that you were disgusted by Gawker’s actions and were shaming them. Then you turned around and did exactly what you claim to be wrong and when called on it, are now whimpering that you won’t get many clicks and it’s not fair to not be doing the same wrong thing as everyone else and wah wah wah wah wah.

        Actions speak louder than words, Ralph. You don’t get to criticize Gawker’s actions and then do the exact same thing. Quit mewling and just own your hypocrisy. If you had principles, you wouldn’t have printed this racist maniac’s manifesto. But you printed it and now The Ralph Retort is as bad as Gawker, capitalizing on hate for clicks.

        Can’t wait until you announce you’re adopting Big Randi’s blockbots to make your Twitter feed a safe space. You might want to look into taking a dietary supplement for that irony deficiency you have there.

        TL;DR: Principles matter only if they don’t interfere with getting clicks.

        1. I seriously do not give a shit about your righteous indignation, to be quite frank with you. I’ve laid out my reasoning, and if I wanted to be slick, I could have just left out my objections altogether. I didn’t, and instead was honest about my feelings on the practice.

          1. You had a binary choice: Be better or be Gawker. You chose the latter.

            All your hand-wringing and harrumphing about how you hate what Gawker did became irrelevant the moment you became them. If you’d left out your objections, then you wouldn’t have become an open hypocrite.

            If you think what Gawker did here or what NBC did with the UVA shooter is wrong, then why would you do the same wrong thing? If EVERYONE is talking about it, it’s not as if your readers couldn’t have found it elsewhere.

            Lots of media outlets are talking about lots of things all the time – just look at the Trending Topics list on FaceSpace. Did you post all those stories here because “everyone is talking about them”? Where’s the story about Eddie Van Halen and Sammy Hagar smacktalking each other? Where are the stories about various celebutards? EVERYONE ELSE IS TALKING ABOUT IT, WHY NOT YOU?!?!?

            You could’ve had your claimed principles, but you tossed them aside and now are butthurt that you’ve been called on it. Because you’re all about being the “no fucks given” guy talking smack, of course you aren’t going to reconsider your actions because to think about what you’ve done may lead to realizing you did wrong and having to backtrack, but just like the aGGros who are still peddling the Big Lies against GamerGate, you never admit error because to admit error opens you to future rebuttals of, “Remember that other time you backed off on….”

            You had a binary choice: Be better or be Gawker. You chose to be Gawker. Period. Hope your 30 clicks were worth it.

            You should hold a logo design contest for your new site name: The Gawker Repeat.

  2. Still a better love story than Twilight. I’m sorry. I couldn’t help myself. I’m not sorry. Ok, a little. Not really. 😛

  3. I’ll grant him that education is fucked up. I have seen a lot of nonsense on the internet written by people who clearly never learned about Gregor Mendel. We are abandoning reason, and because of that people like Trofim Lysenko are making a comeback.

  4. Multiple comments here about how this homicidal racist “makes sense” already prove how bad of an idea this was to publish by itself with zero additional commentary as a counterpoint. This is something I would rather no one read. Its toxic, racist propaganda.

    Combine that with Milo tweeting out race related murder statistics in what blatantly seems like an attempt to say “this guy had a point,” and we’re knee deep in some truly ugly shit that GG really should have no part of. Even Sargon made a video about it.

    What the fuck are you guys doing? If McIntosh was posting unfiltered Osama Bin Laden rants without any counterpoints, I think we all would have a field day with that shit.

    1. Hitler was a big Wagner fan, does that mean there is anything wrong with listening to Wagner? No it does not.

      Even a broken clock will tell the correct time twice a day.

      1. No, Wagner lived 1813-1883. Hitler became a member of the National Socialist Workers Party in 1919.

        It is true that Wagner was antisemitic. but so was pretty much everyone else at that time.

  5. Natural Born Killers needs a sequel where the media is run by disingenuous SJW’s who celebrate chaos by feigning disgust and anger towards that chaos, their bread and butter. In other words, a reflection of reality. And I hope it brings back the dynamic duo.

    I mean, seriously. Does anyone seriously think that people like Jessica Valenti are doing anything other than wetting themselves with glee over this incident because they can use it to make more money and use it to promote their narrative and further their career?

  6. I’m sure the worldwide Asian community is enthralled they get his seal of approval.

    Has he been raped in prison yet? Let’s hope soon if not.

  7. Actually I think these things should always be printed personal feelings about the content of such manifesto’s aside and the satisfaction it gives these psycho’s…
    I think being able to see what’s going on in the minds of such a disturbing person means people stop making up assumptions. Doesn’t make it any less disturbing ofcourse but thats my opinion on this.
    No doubt that this is part of his goals and its fucked up that it gives him the satisfaction but thats just where I stand…

  8. I find myself disturbed by the fact that this guy is not colour blind, and one of Sargon’s vids dealt with feminist who thinks that disregarding race is racist…

    1. Yeah, mariashutup? Never has a username been more apt when it comes to issues like this.

      *No, SJWs I’m not advocating her censorship, its called wit.*

      1. Saw a vid from Prager University on who are the real racists, liberals or conservatives, it raised the point that conservatives really want to leave race behind, liberals not so much

  9. Kids no better than any other attention seeking psycho, only aside from something trivial like trying to imitate the Joker, he went for old traditional racism.

    By all rights he should be forgotten, but wont/can’t be because conservatives and liberals wont allow it.

    1. But what needs to be ended? Parents or friends giving a gun to someone who was already disqualified from owning one?

      Don’t get me wrong, the race issue shouldn’t be forgotten, especially how conservatives are falling all over themselves while trampling the concept of common sense, but then the father should be facing charges as much as the kid. But then the gun issues are as likely to be buried under the race issue. And the race issue in regards to someone who apparently was mentally ill does not need to be looked at that heavily.

      The utter denial that it played a factor in the shooting, that there are documents spelling it out yet Fox News are still trying to dismiss it, Republican presidential nominees are making public speeches which ignore it as well as the shooting – BECAUSE WE NEED MORE FUCKING GUNS – but as it applies to a white kid who if he’s at least not locked up longer than Manson, Manson should be let out, race shouldn’t become an overriding factor.

      In regards to the willful ignorance of conservatives as a whole however…

  10. i’ve always been a “it’s better to know than to not know” kind of person. if i do a thought experiment i can image a circumstance where knowing the thought process of these individuals by reading their missives might provide some benifit in preventing future crimes somehow. however, in the real world i just haven’t seen that kind of benefit.

    in addition publishing these manifestos gives the perpetrators of these crimes an impetus to act in order to get their ramblings attention that they wouldn’t achieve on their own merrit outside of some monstrous act.

    so i have to say that i think these documents should be available for people to study but i don’t think it’s appropriate to publish them on any kind of grand public stage.

    1. Thank you so much for posting this. It reminded me of a video totalbuscuit posted on the Sandy Hook shooting. But aside from this I’d like to bring up something I remember reading in Katherine Newman’s book Rampage (great read on school shootings btw). In it she makes a point that shooters who commit these acts of violence will leave behind a legacy they know people will continue to talk about for years. That is the reason we see them prepare statements, manifestos, videos. recordings, etc. They know someone will find it and tell their story. They know people will want answers and they know that, even if they don’t survive, they will make an impact. It’s truly something that makes you think and when you do you realize just how this video still remains relevant with every mass shooting that occurs.

      Sorry to do this here but if anyone is interested also check out No Easy Answers by Robert Merritt and Brooks Brown. There are some key things mentioned in that book that even might go hand in hand with this video.

      1. I’ll take a look at your suggestions. The problem I think is that these events appeal to our nature. If there’s a threat to our lives we want to know as much as we can. The media know this and prey on our fear.

        Of course this leads into Mean World Syndrome.

        But in the event of a shooting, should the media downplay it, the audience will be baying for more reporting. Either to be more informed or for tragedy porn, I don’t know.

        And you can be sure that had the media downplayed this event, theyd be accused of erasing minority victims. There’s no easy solution.

        1. I’ll give it to you on that last one. The public can be just as guilty as those trying to push the narrative (especially when they want blood, so to speak). It’s no wonder why we can never pin point an exact cause for these tragedies.

    2. I miss the real Charlie Brooker.
      Just goes to show how an echo chamber works. It can “convert” even intelligent people *because* of their altruism, not in spite of it.
      I reckon he’ll eventually come up for air. Whether he is self aware enough to acknowledge his mistake is another matter. He’ll likely justify it through genuine concerns for the issues at hand.

      1. I know. He went from affable yet nihilistic to generic angry man fairly quickly. I guess popularity can suck the soul out of anything.

        Although if I were to think of anyone who’d have a moment of clarity, it’d be Brooker.

  11. Valid motivations =/= valid actions. It’s not that difficult. This guy is right about a lot of stuff, and I’m not ashamed to admit that. And in no way is this an endorsement of his horrific crime against humanity, but someone has to tell it like it is.

  12. wow. never heard of the northwest front. had to google it and didn’t realize it was a thing.

  13. It’s sad how ignorant and poorly educated people gain a little knowledge and apply it in deranged, dangerous ways.
    His brand of insanity does more to perpetuate the bullshit rhetoric that fed his hatred than any minority racist against whites ever could.

  14. Bla bla bla I’m not racist but…why is it every killer like this dickhead has a manifesto? They always seem to have one.

  15. Honestly, I found myself understanding some of his points (Not that I agreed, but I understood how he could think that way), which I found odd (I expected complete nonsense), but it slowly just devolved. I mean, he started off pretty good there, pointing out a lot of stuff that was fair to point out, and then… word vomit.

    I feel a bit tarnished having read it, like I stepped in dog crap with my bare feet. I can wash it off sure, but i’m still disgusted, and the smell’s still faintly there. I’m not surprised though, you don’t just go killing people for nothing, you have to really dehumanize them, truly make them not valuable in some way. In war, it’s self preservation, with murderers, they just can reduce people to a point where they can be killed, but it’s usually situational. Genociders and Serial Killers: This guy, get it so bad they actually believe they’re doing the world a service. It’s full on sociopath. They lose the ability to empathize, or they never develop it.

    I think this person is one of the interesting ones, the one’s with the lights on, everyone’s home, but the lights are the wrong color. I’d state suicide bombers have this type of mentality, they’re brought up to believe that they kill themselves, and others and this is good, holy, and will be rewarded. This type of think is close minded and self perpetuating once activated, and often isn’t reversible, it reaches a fever point, and comes to fruition. I’d even say it isn’t evil, but epically misguided, fueled by narcissism and self perpetuating, reaffirmed, hatred. The worst part, is that until the behavior becomes an issue, we have to tolerate it. I fully believe this.

    We can’t prevent these types people from existing, without denying others the freedom to speak their minds. This is a very wrong person, this is a horrible thing, but we never treat it like that, we just say that people are bad, they’re racist, they’re part of an agenda, we don’t examine them, we examine their channels. We say that this wouldn’t have happened if they didn’t get a gun, or they were checked into a mental institution. We don’t support the victims, we sit there and blame society in every way imaginable. We don’t look at the individual, we paint them as a (Insert stereotype here) and wash our hands of it. This person was different than another who shot up something. We don’t hear that though, it’s just this person’s bad and used a gun, now ban guns. Or men are evil. These situations aren’t tragedies to the reporters, they’re segways. It’s sickening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.