After I saw the report of an alleged incident involving Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields and Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, which was met with general disbelief, I thought it would be interesting to compare this with the reactions to the recent assault on Lauren Southern, a reporter for The Rebel.

Why was one met with disbelief and the other one with support? The difference can be largely explained by the amount of corroborating evidence for both incidents. At this moment, it has been announced that there was an audio recording of the altercation between Fields and Lewandowsky but it has not been released publicly yet (EDITOR: A video has since been released, but the supposed assault looks mild, to say the least.). This is in contrast to Lauren Southern, where a video recording of the assault was released publicly mere hours after the event. In all logic, even with video evidence, there must still be skeptic people who doubt Ms. Southern’s account of the events. There has to be.

In case you’re not familiar with the story, Ms. Southern was assaulted in Vancouver, BC, Canada after attending an event downtown. She was debating some SJWs on the street outside the venue when at some point, a bottle of liquid was poured on her head. Ms. Southern revealed shortly after on Twitter that the liquid was in fact urine. She also announced that she would not pursue criminal prosecution.

Some people voiced their criticism with a bit of humor.

SJW language expands and evolves every day. Somebody who doesn’t believe there are only 2 genders is called “anti-binarist”.

Others implied that she was asking for it. But don’t ever say that about rape victims, that would be wrong! It’s only OK for assault victims with opinions you don’t like.

While some comments were just plain disturbing.

Most comments were just skeptical about the content of the bottle without denying the assault took place

To be fair, the only evidence that it was indeed urine is her own account of the events.

Let’s look at another thread of criticism.

I guess showing her account makes me a bully according to those standards, but Twitter is a public forum and she made a public statement.

Listen and believe. She’s a psychologist, which requires at least a master’s degree in Canada. Of course, the most reputable and trustworthy certified psychologists all have neon pink hair, not just psychology students that don’t yet have to appear professional while employed by a serious medical establishment.

Let’s see more of Pinky’s reasoning.

The self-identified neon-haired psychologist sounds like an expert at identifying human emotions but not at taking screenshots.

After being called out on it, she switched to a different stance.

When asked for proof of Lauren’s previous well-documented lies, she replied with the typical SJW answer of “Educate Yourself”, which usually means she has no proof. She then tried to shift the burden of proof back towards Lauren.

What happened to listen and believe?

These double standards with the burden of proof requirements seem motivated by a personal bias due to an opposing ideology. Wow, I could almost be a psychologist, but I’m lacking the neon pink hair.

Let’s see another appeal to self-authority as a student/expert.

BOOM, opposing opinion is clearly harassment and provocation. As seen in the video, Lauren was forcing the group surrounding her to listen and debate to her. By that definition, it’s OK to assault any street preacher for harassing opinions.

Nice double-standard again, she would be able to tell the difference but not Lauren.

Let’s see an individual comment that got some backlash aka reverse social justice.

Point of logic here: Criticizing a victim of a documented assault, whether the bottle contained water, soda, piss or gasoline, then receiving negative backlash afterwards doesn’t absolve anybody from the blame for their actions. The word “crybully” seems to be fitting in this case.

Strange to say but Literally Hitler makes more sense than SJWs.

Let’s have a look at another example that got a few responses.

SJW logic: If your initial statement is criticized, dig yourself in deeper. Notice that she changed avatar.


Just as a side-note.

Every single male has anger issues but I want to kick a woman in her teeth. Makes sense.

Let’s try to define hate speech.

Then came the backpedaling.

Maybe Pinky the Psychologist could tell us if it is a heartfelt apology or a cop out. Twas just a prank, brah.

Where Are They Now: Twitter Edition.

OK, next special snowflake, seen before but not directly pointed out.

She quickly went into damage-control mode.

Here is a fun fact, those traumatic events allowed them to find each other and form a support group. Lily followed Kel Caine.

That leads us to our next snowflake.

Nice to see that after redefining so many words, SJWs now redefine assault to fit their own criteria. At least the law student knew the definition of assault. Maybe they could educate each other.

So, an acceptable justification for Lauren’s assault according to her is that trans people die every day. Makes sense.

Some people were straight to the point.

Then there came the redefinition of transphobia to fit their needs.

You don’t like cats? TRANSPHOBE!

Which reminds me of a recent event involving a famous anthropomorphic blue hedgehog.

Moving on to the last snowflake.

Again with the redefinition of words, assault is just humiliation and is acceptable…so then is a slap in the face.

Maybe that’s all due to the current political climate of Canada. Here is a direct quote from Canadian PM Justin Trudeau on pink shirt day.

When the leader of a country is saying that words can physically hurt, that helps justify hurting them back physically.

For my final words, let’s just say that there are 10 types of people in the world, those who agree on gender binary and those who don’t.

  1. The term ‘radical feminist’ always reminds me of that Irish guy from Hardy Bucks who used to read the World News “And the radical feminists are at it again, this time giving schtink to the pope.”

  2. Lauren is a better person than me. If someone had tossed piss on me I’d be in jail for beating the shit out of them.

    1. Not if it happened like it happened to Lauren. If you watch the vid you see what I mean. She gets the liquid thrown over her from a bottle from a little guy or girl casually walking off. Then there is a scuffle with some other fat lard getting physical while the suspect flees the scene. Initially she doesn’t know if it was piss and by that time it was already too late to retaliate. It’s only piss tho. Imagine getting a acid-shower in her pretty face, scary thought.

      1. Yeah no joke. These fucking people are cowards of the highest order. Not only are they delusional (only 2 genders, fuckwads, deal with it) but they can’t face people down and defend their positions.

      2. And you know what? Even if it was acid (thank god it wasn’t), the SJW-feminists would still fucking justify the action. Because of you know, “hate speech” and “attacking rape victims” (because every single feminist is a rape victim of course).

        1. I disagree. Most of those “angry SJW/feminists” are not full-fledged psychopaths (or terrorists). They are misguided youth looking for a cause to cling onto because they (still) lead empty & entitled (read boring) lives. It also means that they are fully integrated participants of this society and that means that crazy vigilante actions seldom happen by contrast. They are “powerful” in (online/anonymous) mobs/groups but as individuals they are totally vulnerable to societal standards and the Law. That little hooded RAT that threw the bottle of piss wanted to act tough but wasn’t gonna waste his life over this.

          1. They are “powerful” in (online/anonymous) mobs/groups

            Yes, and don’t we all know it.

            The problem here is that social networking through the Internet has allowed them to find and connect with one another from across the globe, which like you said, makes them powerful online.

            It basically means that if they see anything they dislike or don’t approve of (like posters of sexy women; anti-immigration; father’s rights; a fictional female character in a bikini, etc.) they can just go rushing to their laptops, log-on to Twitter/Tumblr/Facebook and completely spew and re-tweet the biles of hatred towards the producers of the “offending material” until the producer caves in, removes the material and apologizes.

            And even after that, they’ll still try to socially ruin that person’s life, and when they do, they’ll pass it off as some kind of “social justice” or “protecting women”.

            This shit has to fucking stop.

          2. While I’m sure the circle would grow smaller, you cannot deny that there would still be a significant number of these Feminists/SJWs who would immediately rationalize and justify a much more seriously violent act, or even outright murder, of someone deemed to be an enemy of their ideology.

            The very fact that this number of pathological individuals would be greater than zero earns their groups all of my scorn and disgust.

    1. Let’s be fair…transgender people are still of one gender. They’re simply changing what gender they are.

      Otherkin are delusional and retarded.

  3. If these antifa fgts were really anti-fascist, you’d hope a few of them would get disappeared already.

    Personally, I’d love to give them all helicopter rides.

        1. Both a play on word about Feminist Frequency and the name of my parody feminist shows on YouTube. The videos happen once a month.

  4. Transgenderedism is not an independent gender. It basically just means transitional gender (rational people already knew this). The only thing that counts outside of the binary is hermaphroditism /pseudohermaphroditism (having both female and male genitalia) if you want to stick to the scientific literature. Sexual Dimorphism explains all of this. Biology 101…

    To summarize:
    Hermaphrodite/psuedohermaphrodite: Male+Female

    1. Hyep, the only REAL deviations from the male/female binary are the result of neurological disorders or birth defects and both are rare occurrences that do not and cannot ever represent a statistical norm.

  5. Reading some of the SJW comments defending the action of pouring urine over someone is quite disgusting.

    So criticising the bigotry and misandry of feminism means you deserve to be doused in urine and/or have your face smashed into the pavement?

    Fuck off.

  6. There was up to a dozen feminist SJWs there, and they were happy to watch a woman get assaulted in the street and only acted to defend her attacker. These people are part of a cult, and if you aren’t a cult member, you’re fair game to assault. They are walking the same road as militant Islamists, they just haven’t killed anyone yet. They claim victimhood but are invariably the aggressors.

  7. Half of the time they say how happy they are somebody threw piss at her, think it’s a great idea OR say it should have been genuine physical violence.
    The other half of the time they say it’s all made up and cant possibly be true.
    Are they retarded?

  8. The SocJus set get more brazen about actual acts of violence as time goes on. If they keep pushing like this I think they will discover that violence is yet another language they cannot speak with either the volume nor the eloquence of those they hope to silence.

    Just to recap we now have SJWs physically assaulting members of the press and shutting down presidential primary political rallies. What began as mere crybullying has escalated in my opinion into outright sedition. It just gets darker from here now, it’s just a matter of time before enough of society wakes up and realizes what has to be done about it.

  9. So what’s the difference between the way SJWs reacted to Lauren Southern and the way the Trump-tards reacted to Michelle Fields (or, indeed, anyone who criticizes Dear Leader)?
    Seriously, anybody want to take a sober-minded stab at this without descending into “whose ox got gored” territory?

  10. The reason Trump’s was met with disbelief and Lauren’s with support is that Trump is a strong man cult of personality who has captured the zeitgiest of anger. He’s a con man who’s got everybody fooled into thinking he’ll do what’s right because he’s self-funding (lie), an outsider (lie), and a man of the people (lie) who just can’t stop winning (lie). It started as: That didn’t happen, she’s a flaky liar and so is Ben Terris. Then it was a conspiracy to get Trump and the person who assaulted her was a liberal plant. Then it evolved to: So she got shoved by Lewandowski, BUT JUST NOT THAT HARD YOU GUYS. Jeez. It’s got people like Jim and Ralph contorting themselves to come up with even further explanations or conspiracies to explain it all to protect their spirit animal of rage. All that Donald Trump had to do was apologize and fire the guy, but his ego is so damned big he couldn’t bring himself to do it. Imagine what his foreign policy is going to be like, or freedom of the press. This may sound old fashioned, but as long as men are bigger and stronger than women, I’m going to think you’re a caveman and a louse for pushing a woman so hard she’s on the floor with bruises. I want to go back to making fun of BLM, cmapus ninnies, and feminist land whales that dye their pubes blue. I feel like drinking.

  11. The above shows me exactly why you NEVER let a SJW atack go unreported and unpersued. You ALWAYS get the law on board, and you ALWAYS prosecute wherever possible.
    Its shuts their fucking nonsense narratives down, and it teaches the fucking shitweazles they are not above the law.
    Letting them off because its a long legal process is not acceptable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.